Jessica McMillen || Atlanta, GA
Jessica McMillen || User Experience Architect
User Experience Architect || Usability
Ideas

Jared Spool, scent and search

Mar 2006
Last week, at a CHI Atlanta meeting, I had my first opportunity to hear Jared Spool. He spoke about his company’s research into designing for user “scent.” He believes users track information like they do prey, a pursuit during which they experience a subconscious sense of moving closer or further in relation to their target. It is an interesting theory I enjoy mulling over while I should be doing my school work or looking for a job.

In the course of his talk, he asserted that despite claiming to prefer a website’s search capabilities, users will always engage a site through its navigation if their trigger words are in the labels. Scanning for their trigger words first, users will only resort to the search capability if those words aren’t found. He said this behavior is like “creating their own links.” Very astute. However, I have not found this same order of behavior in my (very limited by comparison) observations. Many times, users with a specific goal do not scan the page but go right to the search function. I haven’t studied this theory, but I believe it highly depends on the success each user has had in the past achieving his goals using search on a variety of websites. The experience has probably been pretty poor. Let’s face it, the quality of search functions across websites varies widely. A common approach is to use a preexisting script that produces a page that doesn’t look like the rest of the site with results that don’t seem to make much sense. When did anyone think it was a good idea to let users write their own SQL query?

I believe users would choose search if it provided better results. Search is something users are very comfortable doing on the web. What, again, is Google all about? Do people use Yahoo categories? I need the stats, but I assume not nearly as much as they use the search box to find the content they’re looking for. Otherwise Google would use categories.

I liken using a search function to enlisting the assistance of a sales clerk to help me find a specific item in a large store. Stick with me here. Think of entering a store like Target or Home Depot. Under what circumstances do you seek out a sales clerk to help you find something? I suggest there are four factors: goals, constraints, past experience, and familiarity. How targeted is your goal? Do you just want a broom or are you open to other dust-fighting mechanisms? Do you have other things on your list? The resource constraints you’re operating under such as time or patience play a role. As does your past experience with sales clerks in that specific store as well as stores in general. Also, you take into consideration your familiarity with the layout of that specific store and stores of the same type. What if you aren’t sure what the “thing” you’re looking for is called, but can describe it. What if you know what it is but have no idea what category or section it falls under? No one expects to log onto homedepot.com and find a link for caulk right on the homepage; neither would you expect to walk into the store and find a big sign indicating which aisle caulk is on. But, I don’t know which category it falls under or which aisle it should be on. I have no reasonable trigger word, and I know that. So, where do I go? The sales clerk or the search box.

Jared says people spend more money and time shopping when using categories. I believe him, but people also spend more time and money when they are forced to walk through the winding maze of trinkets for sale on the way to the register at Frye and Best Buy. It doesn’t mean they are happy doing it. I think achieving user happiness requires respecting users with less time and money to waste and helping them achieve their goals efficiently.

So, I propose we stop using cheap scripts that produce crappy search results on our websites just so we can check it off on our heuristic evaluation. When I figure out the best way to do this, I’ll write about it.

Oh, and if I type “caulk” into the search box at homedepot.com, I find that it caulk is categorized under paint supplies. This is baffling to me because I don’t want to paint my tub. I experienced the same surprise when I asked the store clerk where it was when I walked in the store. However, the search results are clear and in context.

Dual temperature controls

Feb 2006
In my husband's new truck, he opted for dual temperature controls. Cool, right? Just set the temperature and let the car do the work for you. Right? Wrong. I suddenly feel the pain of the BMW iDrive victims. Well, not really...but maybe one day pending a job after graduation. Nevertheless, the point I'm making is that dual temperature controls, on a small scale, and the iDrive, on a much bigger scale, take away user control and freedom and obfuscate system functioning. My experience with the dual temperature controls so far has gone something like this. I get in the car and want to turn on the heat (yes, it does get cold in Atlanta). In my trusty '95 Corolla this means you flip the temperature switch over to the red area and move the fan switch somewhere between low and high. Let there be heat. In John's truck, however, I have to decide on a temperature. Hmm...70?...75? I'm not sure. So, I just pick one. Let's say 72. A little while later I'm getting toasty, so I want to reduce the heat. I try going down to 68, but the heat is still blowing. I find this extremely frustrating, so I move it down to 64...wait...the temp can't be adjusted past 65. What? I'm still warm! Plus, John has his setting on 75, so I'm getting warmer. What is going on here? I have no idea. I miss my ability to control the system more directly. The car may be too snug of an environment to successfully implement thermostat-style heating and cooling. People are used to rapid-response controls that provide the illusion of direct manipulation in the car. Maybe they should provide the "old" way of controlling temperatures along with the "new" way. There is certainly room on the dashboard.

Alarm clocks

Feb 2006
I am sure there are some thoughtfully-designed alarm clocks on the market. Mine, however, is not one of them. It has some nice features such as automatic clock set and battery backup. I know battery backup is an old feature, but still one that I appreciate. Mine also has dual alarm settings and day-of-the-week control. The selling point is that you can set one alarm for the weekend and one for the weekday. Nice. But, the one thing my alarm doesn't do is provide any clear indication of which alarm is set and when it will go off. Sure, it has tiny red lights beside white labels that tell me this information, but can I read this from the bed? No (I'm one of those people who keeps the alarm on the dresser rather than the night stand). Plus, even if I can tell if the alarm is set, I'm always nervous that the days are wrong (which has happened) or the AM or PM is mixed up (which has also happened). I want my alarm display this information "The next alarm will sound in 6 hours 27 minutes." This would be extrememly useful! Not only would it provide me with clear indication of the system status, but it would also (possibly) guilt me into going to bed earlier when I realize how little sleep I actually get. Also, I'd like the alarm to flash at nights between the hours of 10 and midnight if it is not set to go off the next morning. Sure, this may be an inconvenience on weekends, but it would be worth it for the times during the week when I have to get out of bed and double-check the alarm. And, to be honest, I nearly never skip setting the alarm...even on Saturdays and Sundays!

Feeling dumbER at Pier One

Dec 2005
Even though I wrote about it on this website and have since reflected on the carelessness with which the credit card machine screen flow was designed several times, I made the exact mistake again yesterday at Pier One. If I didn't know to blame the designer, I would really be wondering about myself right about now.

Finding Today

Oct 2005
I was trying to find a video clip of a Today show segment one day. Since www.todayshow.com doesn't work (why should it??) I went to NBC.com. Well, the NBC.com designers must not have ever thought in a million years that I user would want to find a Today show clip (who would??). It's hard enough to find a link to the Today show on the site at all. On the left, there is a list to seemingly all the shows. I mean, it's long enough. It starts with primetime, moves to late night, then to daytime...hmmm...it stops there. At least, it seems to me that it does. I moved on and looked under "Schedule." That starts at primetime, too. I go back. Needless to say, I'm getting irritated that finding something so obvious is taking so long. Finally, I find the smiling faces of Katie and Matt and a link to the Today show under the heading "NBC News & Sports." Call me crazy, but I didn't think of that. Why is NBC burying a link to one of their most accomplished shows on an interior page?

Feeling dumb at Pier One

Sept 2005
While I was checking out at Pier One the other day, I was poised to swipe my credit card as the clerk was scanning my items. Anticipating my pending swipe, the clerk told me to confirm that I wanted to use a credit card before swiping. I noticed the difference between this machine and most others that allow me to swipe my card at any point. I was mulling over this difference when the question popped up. I didn't read it since the clerk had just prepared me for it. I grabbed the stylus and tapped the first box. Then, horrified, I realized I had just canceled the transaction! "I'm so sorry. I hit the wrong button!" I exclaimed. "Oh, don't worry about it. Everyone does it." the clerk responded. I remarked that my mistake was caused by the "No" button sitting to the left of the "Yes" button. Completely offensive to my mental model! The clerk said, "People do it all the time. It's the pyschology of it."